Protection & Control
Schneider Electric support forum about Protection Relays, Substation Controllers & RTUs, Arc Flash Devices & Systems in Medium Voltage and Low Voltage. A place to get support on product selection, installation, commissioning and troubleshooting.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
The analog value I am reading has a minus sign (-) and an incomplete value. What settings am I making a mistake in? Has anyone had this problem? I am
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Hello,
In standard, MMEB format should transmit signed 16-bit values (so from -32768 to + 32767).
These measurements will be managed in this format by PowerLogic T300 if they have been declared as MMEB.
Apparently, the P3 uses unsigned 16-bit values (from 0 to 65536) and does not scale down the values.
1. If the value is less than 32767, no issue.
2. If the value is higher than 32767, the most significant bit of the 16-bit format will be set and treated as a negative sign by T300. This explains the values shown on T300 WebApp (see example below).
Ex: 33933 V -> 0x848D -> -31603 (signed 16-bit value).
If no scaling system can be found on the P3, we can use PowerLogic T300 logic formulas to correct the value, by adding 65535 to the negative values (see below):
Another idea: use the "normalized" (MMEA) format proposed by P3 (but I don't know how the conversion can be done in this case - maybe using the corresponding "Max" setting that can be seen on the "IEC 60870-5-101: AI" page.
regards,
Mathieu.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Hello John Archer,
In MMEB the value stored in coreDb is converted in a 16-bit entire signed value. So once it exceeds the 16 bit range,it throws the negative value. Hence you need to change the phase voltage AB, BC and CA data type as MMEC which is 32 bit floating value has wide range.
If you want to use the data type as MMEB only, then you need to scale down the value to 16 bit range.
Regards,
Sathish
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
@sathishkumar_ramakrishnan Thanks for the reply. The Easergy Relay I am using only reads MMEB values. How do I change from 32-bit to 16-bit value? Also, the measurement format is not normalized and does not transmit analog information at all.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Hello John,
I have tested this MMEB values of the PowerLogic P3 relay with the TMW 101master [ Simulator tool], thus taking PowerLogic T300 out of the equation: the phase voltage values are displayed negatively (see attached screen shot of the same).
The Easergy Pro software will show the correct value, since it is not the standard protocol implementation tool. As I mentioned earlier MMEB datatype is a 16-bit value only: hence its showing negative values once it crosses the range.
From P3 relay, using a scaling factor is needed to provide the 16-bit data to T300 or to any IEC101 master device integration for correct data representation. However, I have not been able to find information regarding the scaling factor for P3 relay.
Regards,
Sathish
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Hello,
In standard, MMEB format should transmit signed 16-bit values (so from -32768 to + 32767).
These measurements will be managed in this format by PowerLogic T300 if they have been declared as MMEB.
Apparently, the P3 uses unsigned 16-bit values (from 0 to 65536) and does not scale down the values.
1. If the value is less than 32767, no issue.
2. If the value is higher than 32767, the most significant bit of the 16-bit format will be set and treated as a negative sign by T300. This explains the values shown on T300 WebApp (see example below).
Ex: 33933 V -> 0x848D -> -31603 (signed 16-bit value).
If no scaling system can be found on the P3, we can use PowerLogic T300 logic formulas to correct the value, by adding 65535 to the negative values (see below):
Another idea: use the "normalized" (MMEA) format proposed by P3 (but I don't know how the conversion can be done in this case - maybe using the corresponding "Max" setting that can be seen on the "IEC 60870-5-101: AI" page.
regards,
Mathieu.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.