Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Notifications
Login / Register
Community
Community
Notifications
close
  • Forums
  • Knowledge Center
  • Events & Webinars
  • Ideas
  • Blogs
Help
Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Login / Register
Sustainability
Sustainability

We Value Your Feedback!
Could you please spare a few minutes to share your thoughts on Cloud Connected vs On-Premise Services. Your feedback can help us shape the future of services.
Learn more about the survey or Click here to Launch the survey
Schneider Electric Services Innovation Team!

MicroLink: APC has dropped the ball. May loose my business.

APC UPS Data Center & Enterprise Solutions Forum

Schneider, APC support forum to share knowledge about installation and configuration for Data Center and Business Power UPSs, Accessories, Software, Services.

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Home
  • Schneider Electric Community
  • APC UPS, Critical Power, Cooling and Racks
  • APC UPS Data Center & Enterprise Solutions Forum
  • MicroLink: APC has dropped the ball. May loose my business.
Options
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Mark Topic as New
  • Mark Topic as Read
  • Float this Topic for Current User
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Printer Friendly Page
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send Invite Cancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Send New Invite Close
Top Experts
User Count
BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
5060
voidstar_apc
Janeway voidstar_apc
196
Erasmus_apc
Sisko Erasmus_apc
112
Teken
Spock Teken
110
View All

Invite a Colleague

Found this content useful? Share it with a Colleague!

Invite a Colleague Invite
Solved Go to Solution
Back to APC UPS Data Center & Enterprise Solutions Forum
Solved
BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:44 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:02 AM

0 Likes
5
1119
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:44 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:02 AM

MicroLink: APC has dropped the ball. May loose my business.

For over twenty years my company has deployed APC UPSes as part of our controls system product line. Our qty's can reach as high 200+ units a year. Now, for APC, 200 units a year is nothing, but add up the volumes we have moved for the last twenty years. Also add in the replacement batteries and replacement units that go out every 3-5 years for existing customers.

We have just spent a lot of $$ on R&D to move from the simple signal (uses 940-0020 cable) to the UPSLink protocol (using 940-0024 cable). We use an RTOS, so the software provided by APC is no good to us. Now they have discontinued the UPS that has fit our application for the last seven years. That unit was a small tower that fit our control cabinets. Their listed replacement is a rackmount and only works with this new MicroLink communications.

First, how can you list a recommended replacement that is not a form-fit unit. Now, there is a unit that is a form-fit replacement, the SMT. However, it does not support the UPSLink communications, so its not a functional replacement.

I am told that a new interface, the AP9620, will allow for use of the UPSLink with the SMT units. Ok, another set of problems, the AP9620 is not released yet. So, I have projects that cannot be completed because I have no form-fit-function UPS to supply critical backup power to the main control system.

On top of this, APC will not make the MicroLink protocol available, even under license. So, we will have to increase cost on every project to include the AP9620.

As a global corporation, if I were to discontinue a product line without first having a proven FORM-FIT-FUNCTION replacement we would loose business and I would loose my job.

If I am unable to access the MicroLink protocol, causing me to have to purchase the AP9620, then I will instead invest in developing my RTOS interface to work a UPS from a company other than APC.

Labels
  • Labels:
  • UPS Management Devices & PowerChute Software
  • Tags:
  • ap9620
  • microlink
  • upslink
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

  • All forum topics
  • Previous Topic
  • Next Topic

Accepted Solutions
BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1115
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

For over twenty years my company has deployed APC UPSes as part of our controls system product line. Our qty's can reach as high 200+ units a year. Now, for APC, 200 units a year is nothing, but add up the volumes we have moved for the last twenty years. Also add in the replacement batteries and replacement units that go out every 3-5 years for existing customers.

We have just spent a lot of $$ on R&D to move from the simple signal (uses 940-0020 cable) to the UPSLink protocol (using 940-0024 cable). We use an RTOS, so the software provided by APC is no good to us. Now they have discontinued the UPS that has fit our application for the last seven years. That unit was a small tower that fit our control cabinets. Their listed replacement is a rackmount and only works with this new MicroLink communications.

First, how can you list a recommended replacement that is not a form-fit unit. Now, there is a unit that is a form-fit replacement, the SMT. However, it does not support the UPSLink communications, so its not a functional replacement.

I am told that a new interface, the AP9620, will allow for use of the UPSLink with the SMT units. Ok, another set of problems, the AP9620 is not released yet. So, I have projects that cannot be completed because I have no form-fit-function UPS to supply critical backup power to the main control system.

On top of this, APC will not make the MicroLink protocol available, even under license. So, we will have to increase cost on every project to include the AP9620.

As a global corporation, if I were to discontinue a product line without first having a proven FORM-FIT-FUNCTION replacement we would loose business and I would loose my job.

If I am unable to access the MicroLink protocol, causing me to have to purchase the AP9620, then I will instead invest in developing my RTOS interface to work a UPS from a company other than APC.

See Answer In Context

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Replies 5
BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1115
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM


We have located some stock of the SUA1000 at Wesco and Ingram Micro, but we will deplete stock at both vendors within a week or two. Additional stock has been located at Amazon.



Ultimately I would like to move to the MicroLink communications and implement the SMT series. For I now, I would like to discuss reimplementing production of the SUA750xl. The 750 is already slightly larger than what we need; this makes the 1000 a major overkill.

As for the microlink streaming protocol, we won't know if implementing it into our QNX based solution is a good fit or not until we have it in front of our development team.

I need a contact at APC to discuss this further.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1115
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

hi james,

sorry it took so long to post back - I wanted to make sure the right people at APC were aware of your post so that you got an appropriate answer to your comments/concerns/questions and that they did not go unheard.

Based on that, here is what i want to ask and let you know that:

After reading your post, it sounds like you are using SUA750*XL*, based on the reference to the form factor change, which is the same box size as SUA1000 and SUA1000/1500 and is something we will be continuing to supply in another, different special circumstance.

I want to make sure that it is also clear that we tried to capture information from customers who might have special communication requirements before releasing the new product and apologize for the fact that he did not get captured in our net of information.

For some customers who have these communication requirements, we have been able to make the legacy product available (SUA750XL) until the AP9620 is available, which will allow the new product to meet another end user's communication requirement. However, it would be important for us to understand how you typically buy APC product and through whom so we can determine if we can make legacy product available to you.

I can give you the option to try the new solution, SMT1000 + AP9620 before making a long term commitment to a different solution - whether through APC or another vendor.

Lastly, we definitely recognize customer concerns with these special communication requirements with regard to the fact there is now an additional piece of hardware, i.e., the AP9620 and APC is investigating options to address this.

Thanks.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1115
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

It is unfortunate that we were not able to become an APC OEM partner in the past. This certainly would have provided for better communications.

Our purchasing department acquires the APC units from multiple vendors based on availability. A primary source for us has been Wesco.

I had looked at the SUA1000, but it was listed as ‘not available in country of choice’. I’ve requested my purchasing department to look into acquiring this unit in the U.S. If it is within the same dimensions and works with the 940-0020 cable as well as the UPSLink protocol then we should have no problem placing it into our product.

If we were able to continue to obtain the SUA750xl that would be the best solution. I would like to move to the SMT750, but not at the cost of having to install the AP9620. If we had a way to gain access to the MicroLink protocol then we could revise our solution to add support for the SMT and plan for migration away from the SUA series over time.

While other UPS manufacturers are offering an NDA for full disclosure of their protocols, APC has only provided agreements for accessing the UPSLink protocol. I can understand moving away from UPSLink and going to MicroLink. The new protocol offers better functionality and control. However, not providing access to the new protocol just alienates OEM integrators.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1117
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

microlink operates differently though. it is a streaming protocol rather than a request based protocol. i understand what you mean about the NDA but i am not even sure that the new protocol would suit your needs if we did indeed offer an NDA.

i know you are investigating a few things on your end with replacements currently.

what i can do for you now from APC's standpoint, based on my offerings above?

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

BillP
Administrator BillP Administrator
Administrator

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

0 Likes
0
1116
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2021-06-30 07:45 PM . Last Modified: ‎2024-03-07 02:01 AM

For over twenty years my company has deployed APC UPSes as part of our controls system product line. Our qty's can reach as high 200+ units a year. Now, for APC, 200 units a year is nothing, but add up the volumes we have moved for the last twenty years. Also add in the replacement batteries and replacement units that go out every 3-5 years for existing customers.

We have just spent a lot of $$ on R&D to move from the simple signal (uses 940-0020 cable) to the UPSLink protocol (using 940-0024 cable). We use an RTOS, so the software provided by APC is no good to us. Now they have discontinued the UPS that has fit our application for the last seven years. That unit was a small tower that fit our control cabinets. Their listed replacement is a rackmount and only works with this new MicroLink communications.

First, how can you list a recommended replacement that is not a form-fit unit. Now, there is a unit that is a form-fit replacement, the SMT. However, it does not support the UPSLink communications, so its not a functional replacement.

I am told that a new interface, the AP9620, will allow for use of the UPSLink with the SMT units. Ok, another set of problems, the AP9620 is not released yet. So, I have projects that cannot be completed because I have no form-fit-function UPS to supply critical backup power to the main control system.

On top of this, APC will not make the MicroLink protocol available, even under license. So, we will have to increase cost on every project to include the AP9620.

As a global corporation, if I were to discontinue a product line without first having a proven FORM-FIT-FUNCTION replacement we would loose business and I would loose my job.

If I am unable to access the MicroLink protocol, causing me to have to purchase the AP9620, then I will instead invest in developing my RTOS interface to work a UPS from a company other than APC.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Preview Exit Preview

never-displayed

You must be signed in to add attachments

never-displayed

 
To The Top!

Forums

  • APC UPS Data Center Backup Solutions
  • EcoStruxure IT
  • EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
  • Metering & Power Quality
  • Schneider Electric Wiser

Knowledge Center

Events & webinars

Ideas

Blogs

Get Started

  • Ask the Community
  • Community Guidelines
  • Community User Guide
  • How-To & Best Practice
  • Experts Leaderboard
  • Contact Support
Brand-Logo
Subscribing is a smart move!
You can subscribe to this board after you log in or create your free account.
Forum-Icon

Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.

Register today for FREE

Register Now

Already have an account? Login

Terms & Conditions Privacy Notice Change your Cookie Settings © 2025 Schneider Electric

This is a heading

With achievable small steps, users progress and continually feel satisfaction in task accomplishment.

Usetiful Onboarding Checklist remembers the progress of every user, allowing them to take bite-sized journeys and continue where they left.

of