Ask our Experts
Didn't find what you are looking for? Ask our experts!
Share Your Feedback – Help Us Improve Search on Community! Please take a few minutes to participate in our Search Feedback Survey. Your insights will help us deliver the results you need faster and more accurately. Click here to take the survey
This forum is for engineers working EcoStruxure Building Operation, wanting to leverage the SEAL application to improve the efficiency in the engineering process.
Search in
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-02-04 12:19 AM . Last Modified: 2025-02-04 12:22 AM
Hi
I am using Seal version 1.12.1.1 and is having problem with getting all layers converted.
In Autocad I have the Layer L-HAT-CONC which are the solid walls showing here:
I convert the drawing with these settings
After conversion the Layer is not in the file and the concrete is missing.
Any idea, why this is happening, and can it be solved ?
Attached are both the source file and the converted file.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-02-12 12:12 AM
I did a quick peek and it is the HATCH element that we do not currently support you are looking for.
Support for HATCH was not included in the initial release as it is a more complex element.
A limitation to think about is that a HATCH can have solid or pattern fill, in our case only solid fill can be represented in a good way in TGML.
This feature request is added to the backlog as 18160 in the system.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-02-04 05:02 AM
Added as defect 18102 in our system
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-02-06 01:28 AM
Just guessing here, this is probably a Hatch DWG element, those elements have a tendency to require lots of elements to be represented in TGML even if when they look simple.
We will take a quick look at the file next week.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-02-12 12:12 AM
I did a quick peek and it is the HATCH element that we do not currently support you are looking for.
Support for HATCH was not included in the initial release as it is a more complex element.
A limitation to think about is that a HATCH can have solid or pattern fill, in our case only solid fill can be represented in a good way in TGML.
This feature request is added to the backlog as 18160 in the system.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
You’ve reached the end of your document
Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.