Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Notifications
Login / Register
Community
Community
Notifications
close
  • Forums
  • Knowledge Center
  • Events & Webinars
  • Ideas
  • Blogs
Help
Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Login / Register
Sustainability
Sustainability

We Value Your Feedback!
Could you please spare a few minutes to share your thoughts on Cloud Connected vs On-Premise Services. Your feedback can help us shape the future of services.
Learn more about the survey or Click here to Launch the survey
Schneider Electric Services Innovation Team!

Multiple Questions on the Netbotz 250

EcoStruxure IT forum

Schneider Electric support forum about installation and configuration for DCIM including EcoStruxure IT Expert, IT Advisor, Data Center Expert, and NetBotz

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results forΒ 
ShowΒ Β onlyΒ  | Search instead forΒ 
Did you mean:Β 
  • Home
  • Schneider Electric Community
  • EcoStruxure IT
  • EcoStruxure IT forum
  • Multiple Questions on the Netbotz 250
Options
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Mark Topic as New
  • Mark Topic as Read
  • Float this Topic for Current User
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Printer Friendly Page
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send Invite Cancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Send New Invite Close
Top Experts
User Count
Cory_McDonald
Admiral Cory_McDonald Admiral
124
Jef
Admiral Jef Admiral
109
gsterling
Captain gsterling Captain
71
APC_Steve
Captain APC_Steve Captain
62
View All

Invite a Colleague

Found this content useful? Share it with a Colleague!

Invite a Colleague Invite
Back to EcoStruxure IT forum
DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

0 Likes
24
3189
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Multiple Questions on the Netbotz 250

New to the Netbotz 250.

Had a 355 fail and testing a 250 as the replacement for it (the 355 has features never needed/used such as camera, air flow, dew point).

Standalone unit, using the web interface, no dco/dce to go along with it.

Several questions... (of these, #2 is possibly the biggest concern)

1)  Bold warning about plugging up to a PoE switch.  I think we're hard pressed to find any enterprise level switch that doesn't do PoE.  So, realistically, will it harm the NB250 to plug it into a switch supporting POE?  (I don't have switch access so cannot disable PoE).  Right now as I test it, it's plugged into a small deskside switch.

2)  When I look at the data logs for temperature (wired sensor that came with the unit), I see temp readings that are about 7 degrees less than what the sensor shows when I look at the status.  It's been online for about 72 hours as of now and this discrepancy looks to be consistent.   I see the same thing when I graph the data log or export it to a csv file.  For example, it shows 66.4 degrees when I look at live status.  But the logs all show temps of less than 60 degrees.  Interval is set to 10 minutes.  If there was wide variation in temp then I could see the average being less than the current, but that is not the case.

Running the latest firmware - 6.5.6

This was a test... and I might just go back to the 355 as there were some nice features w/o having to get other software (for example I could have it email me the graphics on a scheduled basis).

Thoughts?

Attached a couple images.  One of the 8 hr graph.  One of the current status of the same sensor.

Humidity is logging and showing correctly, so it's only the temp that is logging/graphing wrong.

And yes, I know that the temperature is NOT hovering around 57 πŸ˜€ 

I'll connect a couple more on Monday to see if this is consistent.

 

(CID:132662221)

Labels
  • Labels:
  • NetBotz
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

  • All forum topics
  • Previous Topic
  • Next Topic
Replies 24
DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

0 Likes
11
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

I added 3 more wired temp/humidity sensors this morning.

All of them show the same symptom described in #2 above.  The "live" temperature reading does NOT match the readings being logged/graphed.  (I looked at the graph and I exported the data and looked at it in the CSV file).  These same sensors worked and logged properly on the old 355 that I had.

Here is another sample from a different sensor this morning.

(CID:132662694)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Dear Cal H,

Very interesting problem, similar to a bug: please take temperature/humidity readings in NetBotz-250 every minute and compare with the "live" temperature/humidity of the wired sensors. What will be the result?

Please specify the model of your wired temperature/humidity sensors?

With respect.

(CID:132662859)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 07:59 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Thanks for that suggestion.  I am doing that now.  Based on maybe 10 minutes at the 1 minute interval, the logged temp (not so much the humidity, just the temp) is still skewed.  Image attached of a 3 minute window, and of the live data as of the most recent 1 minute log.

Interestingly, I added a wireless temp sensor (the one that came with the package).  It's temp is logged correctly at the 10 minute interval when I compare the logged data to live data.  It's also matching at the 1 minute interval.

The wired temp/humidity sensors are the AP9335TH ones - 3 'older' that I already had, 1 new that came with the 250.

I opened a support call, and spent an hour or so in a WebEx.  They can see what I'm seeing, but when they tried to reproduce on their 250 with the same FW version they don't seem to be able to reproduce...

 

(CID:132662863)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Dear Cal H,

Ok, then another experiment - change the unit of measurement from F to degrees C. If you get a similar bug, then most likely it is the hardware problem of your individual NetBotz-250...

With respect.

(CID:132662922)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Another good suggestion.  I changed from F to C.  Watched a few minutes of the logging and it appears to be the same.  So I rebooted the 250 and then watched a few more minutes of logging after a restart just to be sure.

I'll add these notes to the existing case.

I do plan on spinning up a DCE to see if it shows anything different when pulling information from the 250.  I suspect SNMP queries will pull live data, so that might not tell me much.

Will be interesting to see how this is handled as right now it makes my logged data/history useless.

(CID:132662939)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Dear Cal H,

I do plan on spinning up a DCE to see if it shows anything different when pulling information from the 250. I suspect SNMP queries will pull live data, so that might not tell me much.

Will be interesting to see how this is handled as right now it makes my logged data/history useless.

Ok, find out how it will be in DCE software, you can already now and quickly πŸ˜€. To do this, simply download the snmpwalk-package from the web-page How to create a SNMP walk file for Struxureware Expert/InfraStruXure Central. And follow the instructions to create a snmpwalk-file for your NetBotz-250 with your firmware.

After analyzing the snmpwalk-file (this is simple ASCII file), you can find out exactly which OIDs are corresponding to your wired temperature/humidity sensors (not wireless, as they are detected separately). I can help you with this and you will be able to find out whether SNMP values correspond to real values or not.

With respect.

(CID:132663037)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Done.  SNMPwalk output created.  I'm looking through it and also looking for a reference to see which OIDs are the actual temp/humidy values.

(CID:132663149)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

I.e., even through SNMP you see a mismatch with the real temperature?

(CID:132663153)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

After a little digging, I'm guessing celcius, and these relevant values based on where my sensors are:

1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.10.4.2.3.1.5.0.1 (temp in celcius rounded sensor port 1)

and    ........6.0.1 (humidity rounded sensor port 1)

If that's the case then SNMP is pulling the current values rounded to the nearest whole number

(CID:132663213)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Rounding must be up to 0.1. Is this true for your NetBotz-250?

Also, does OID tree 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.10.4.2.3.1.9 exist in your snmpwalk-file?

With respect.

(CID:132663223)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:00 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:22 AM

Yes, that OID exists... and it looks like the temp in celcius w/o a decimal – so 181 for example (matching 18, and 165 matching 16.5 and rounding to 17).

I assume humidity is just rounded to nearest whole #

Looks like wireless sensor data is probably under 1.3.6.1.4.1.318.1.1.10.5.1.1.1 or similar.

Thanks!

(CID:132663240)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Dear Cal H,

This is correct, because the NetBotz-250 via SNMP protocol sent the temperature of wired sensors twice: with normal accuracy and with high precision. Those, 181 - 18.1C, 165 - 16.5C, etc. In DCE software, these values will be displayed with an accuracy of 0.1.

With respect.

(CID:132663268)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Re #1, I answered that one myself.  Plug it into a POE port and it never comes online.  You get link, and activity but it never comes online network-wise. 

Bad design (in my opinion) on that,  as in enterprise networks, most enterprise switches are POE now in order to support VoIP and often cannot be managed by local teams (as is my case).  So my only option is to either get the management team to disable POE on the port, or put a non-poe switch in between the enterprise port and the 250.

(CID:132662902)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

there are different levels of POE - if you need "AT" and it isn't being offered... things won't work

802.3af - 15.4 watts maximum

802.3at - 30 watts maximum

802.3bt - 60 watts maximum  (this requires 4 pairs of wire)

 

regular POE is 2 par, strands 4,5 and 7,8 (the blue and brown pairs)

(CID:132664298)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Dear Cal H and Eric Clark,

I agree with Cal H and very much hope, that this bug will be fixed in future revisions of NetBotz-250 and its firmware. But since this can be a very lengthy process, I can only recommend using two-pair patch cord (only green and orange pairs) to connect the NetBotz-250 via ethernet.

For example, it could be a standard Cat. 5e patch cord with blue and brown pairs cut off from one side. Or you can use the standard RJ-45 coupler (F-to-F type) with 4,5 and 7,8 contacts removed. All this will allow, without costs, to avoid the above mentioned problem in NetBotz-250 right now.

Dear Cal H, we will be interested to know if you could solve your problem with wire temperature/humidity sensors or not?

With respect.

(CID:132664540)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

In this case, the 250 simply doesn't work with a PoE port (it really should - and should simply ignore the probe as the switch will not send power if not 'requested'.  Its a shame that the workaround is to have a modified 2 pair cable so as not to have the issue... or to have to inject a non-poe switch between an enterprise one and the 250.

Regarding the wired temp/humidity data logging, no solution was identified.  We can confirm that the wireless sensor reads correctly and that the data is logged correctly.  Fir the wireless, temp/humidity, the sensor reads correctly 'real-time'.  SNMP queries pull the correct data 'real-time'.  But the logging of the temperature is many degrees off - but not the humidity - it is correct.  Logging at 1 minute intervals shows the same variation - 6-10 degress lower than the actual temperature is what is logged.

I have updated the ticket several times but no further response, so today I will likely call back directly.

Interesting fact about my failed 355.  I took it apart to see if I could identify a blown part/etc.   In the middle of the board is a typical device power connector - it's even labeled AUX PWR.  And lo and behold, the plastic back even has a hole cut in the plastic to accommodate it, but the adhesive label covers it up.  I went so far as to cut the label and locate a suitable AC adapter, and the 355 still works perfectly fine when powered via the AUX PWR.  It just will not work when  you try to power it via POE now.  I cant find that AUX PWR documented anywhere and sure could not find an adapter for sale – just thought I'd mention it.  I'm considering putting it back into use if nothing is resolved on the 250.

(CID:132664601)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

From your comment:

In this case, the 250 simply doesn't work with a PoE port (it really should - and should simply ignore the probe as the switch will not send power if not 'requested'.

I doubt it. It should not be. Have you checked this? Which model of PoE switch do you use?

...But the logging of the temperature is many degrees off - but not the humidity - it is correct. Logging at 1 minute intervals shows the same variation - 6-10 degress lower than the actual temperature is what is logged.

I have updated the ticket several times but no further response, so today I will likely call back directly.

This is a really problem, and Schneider Electric employees must answer: either this is a problem with the latest firmware or it is a malfunction of your NetBotz-250, which you just need to replace under warranty.

...I went so far as to cut the label and locate a suitable AC adapter, and the 355 still works perfectly fine when powered via the AUX PWR.  It just will not work when  you try to power it via POE now.

Many thanks for the interesting and useful information - I did not know about it. This is a really good solution to the problem. What voltage and amperage did you use AC adapter?

With respect.

(CID:132664621)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

I'm using a 13V, .8A adapter.  It also worked at 12V, .3A when I initially tested the connector.  Given that it is not documented anywhere that I have been able to find, I'm not sure what the correct / recommended V / A is.

(CID:132664624)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:01 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Ok, many thanks for the information πŸ˜€.

I will also be interested in how your problem will be solved with wire temperature/humidity sensors and the NetBotz-250 connection to the PoE switch.

With respect.

(CID:132664632)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
1
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

FYI... I heard back... the problem with the logging of different values for temperature on wired Temp/Humidity sensors (different than the actual temperature) was identified and should be fixed in a new firmware release in August-September.  No indication of what the actual problem was, but it is being addressed.

(CID:132668957)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

In response to DCIM_Support
0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Dear Cal H,

Thanks for the useful information. I understand your problem, so let's hope that soon this bug will be fixed.

With respect.

(CID:132668963)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Dear Cal H,

In connection with the release of the new firmware v.6.6.7 for the NetBotz-250 device, I can say the following about your questions.

Q1: As stated on the official resource of User Assistance for NetBotz Rack Monitor 250:

- IMPORTANT! The NetBotz Rack Monitor 250 is not a PoE compatible device. Do not connect a NetBotz Rack Monitor 250 to a PoE (Power over Ethernet) switch.

Q2: As stated in the release of the new firmware v.6.6.7 Release Notes.pdf:

That is, in the new firmware version v.6.6.7 for NetBotz-250 devices the above specified bug is fixed.

Try it and report the result, please.

With respect.

(CID:137112639)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2024-04-04 04:21 AM

Hi Cal H,

Just an FYI on the POE thing, I do not see in the report on that issue that there was any damage specifically reported however there were a number of reports where the device would simply not come up on the network. I would simply avoid it if possible as noted in previous responses.

 

Steve

(CID:137725898)

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

DCIM_Support
Picard DCIM_Support
Picard

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2023-10-22 03:05 AM

0 Likes
0
3188
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: β€Ž2020-07-04 08:02 PM . Last Modified: β€Ž2023-10-22 03:05 AM

superhero.png

This question is closed for comments. You're welcome to start a new topic if you have further comments on this issue.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

To The Top!

Forums

  • APC UPS Data Center Backup Solutions
  • EcoStruxure IT
  • EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
  • Metering & Power Quality
  • Schneider Electric Wiser

Knowledge Center

Events & webinars

Ideas

Blogs

Get Started

  • Ask the Community
  • Community Guidelines
  • Community User Guide
  • How-To & Best Practice
  • Experts Leaderboard
  • Contact Support
Brand-Logo
Subscribing is a smart move!
You can subscribe to this board after you log in or create your free account.
Forum-Icon

Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.

Register today for FREE

Register Now

Already have an account? Login

Terms & Conditions Privacy Notice Change your Cookie Settings Β© 2025 Schneider Electric

This is a heading

With achievable small steps, users progress and continually feel satisfaction in task accomplishment.

Usetiful Onboarding Checklist remembers the progress of every user, allowing them to take bite-sized journeys and continue where they left.

of