Welcome to the new Schneider Electric Community

It's your place to connect with experts and peers, get continuous support, and share knowledge.

Close
Important Announcement: WELCOME to the new Schneider Electric Community! Community is now no longer part of Exchange, and is now rebranded under se.com. If you have any bookmarks and links saved, we request you to update them to ensure that you continue accessing our community from this new location. For any issues that you might encounter as part of this change, please reach out to SchneiderCommunity.Support@se.com, and the team will help to get your issues resolved.
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the Exchange portal.Just enter their email address and we’ll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
Send Invite Cancel
82145members
349682posts

Unbalance CT: Why do we use "measurement" type class 1 and not "protection" type (5P10,...)?

Metering & Power Quality

Collaborate with multiple experts and discuss various topics about Power Meters and Power Quality. From design & implementation to troubleshooting and more, get support from experts and share your experiences by subscribing to the Schneider Electric Exchange forum today.

Thierry
Commander Commander
Commander

Unbalance CT: Why do we use "measurement" type class 1 and not "protection" type (5P10,...)?

This good question came to me from Li Ling (Schneider Electric China).

Here are some explanations:

For unbalance protection of MV capacitor bank we must use a "Measurement" type of CT.

The reason is that the unbalance protection relay must operate at a current smaller or equal to the rated secondary current of the CT.

Only the "Measurement" type of CT can have its accuracy level guaranteed between 25% to 100% of its secondary rated current.

For "Protection" type of CT the accuracy is guaranteed for values higher than the rated secondary current.

Feel free to add comments and/or complete this answer.

BR