Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Notifications
Login / Register
Community
Community
Notifications
close
  • Forums
  • Knowledge Center
  • Events & Webinars
  • Ideas
  • Blogs
Help
Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Login / Register
Sustainability
Sustainability

Join our "Ask Me About" community webinar on May 20th at 9 AM CET and 5 PM CET to explore cybersecurity and monitoring for Data Center and edge IT. Learn about market trends, cutting-edge technologies, and best practices from industry experts.
Register and secure your Critical IT infrastructure

How to use PAC4200 as Modbus TCP to RTU Gateway with M580 PLC

Industry Automation and Control Forum

This forum is addressing industrial automation design & engineering, operations, asset performance, cyber security and digital transformation for Plants & Machines.

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Home
  • Schneider Electric Community
  • Industrial Automation
  • Industry Automation and Control Forum
  • How to use PAC4200 as Modbus TCP to RTU Gateway with M580 PLC
Options
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Mark Topic as New
  • Mark Topic as Read
  • Float this Topic for Current User
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Printer Friendly Page
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send Invite Cancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Send New Invite Close
Top Experts
User Count
Bastian_Schmitz
Admiral Bastian_Schmitz Admiral
32
LeTomas
Lt. Commander LeTomas Lt. Commander
11
RoozeeR
Lt. Commander RoozeeR Lt. Commander
6
JerryBartlemay
Lieutenant JG JerryBartlemay Lieutenant JG
6
View All

Invite a Colleague

Found this content useful? Share it with a Colleague!

Invite a Colleague Invite
Solved Go to Solution
Back to Industry Automation and Control Forum
Solved
Senthil1
Crewman Senthil1
Crewman

Posted: ‎2024-06-13 07:18 AM

0 Likes
5
1182
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-13 07:18 AM

How to use PAC4200 as Modbus TCP to RTU Gateway with M580 PLC

I am using Siemens PAC4200 meter on modbus TCP with M580 controller. This PAC4200 meter can work as a modbus TCP slave and also modbus TCP to RTU gateway. Means Modbus RTU slaves can be connected under the PAC4200 meter and PLC can read data from these RTU slaves via PAC4200 as a gateway. This needs some changes in the modbus request, i.e. port number to be changed to 17002 instead of default 502 and Unit ID to be changed as the node address of the RTU device instead of default 255 . I am using Read_var instruction to generate modbus requests, can you please help how to modify the port number and Unit ID in the modbus requests?

Labels
  • Labels:
  • Process Automation Talks
  • Tags:
  • english
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

  • All forum topics
  • Previous Topic
  • Next Topic

Accepted Solutions
Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander

Posted: ‎2024-06-19 05:29 AM

In response to Senthil1
0 Likes
0
1118
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-19 05:29 AM

Looks like youre tying to ask for untid 10 @ 192.168.0.9?

The only differencd I see in our arrays is my ProtId is 16x02 in stead of 16x00 in your Read_Addr[2] high byte. I'm just running a simulation on my compter. do you have a "normal" modbus device you can test the addmx and read_var function with (using the normal port)?

See Answer In Context

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Replies 5
Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander

Posted: ‎2024-06-16 02:07 PM

0 Likes
3
1147
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-16 02:07 PM

You should be able to create your address array with an ADDMX block and substitute the port before sending it to the read_var block.

With an input to the ADDMX like '0.0.3{192.168.1.1}1' the element in the [6] position of the output array is 502. Try changing that to 17002 and see if it works. 

The syntax I used for ADDMX is 'rack.module.chanel{target ip}node' see the Control Expert help for more details on how to use this block.

 

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Senthil1
Crewman Senthil1
Crewman

Posted: ‎2024-06-18 08:05 AM

In response to Bosswaffle
0 Likes
0
1123
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-18 08:05 AM

Hi Bosswaffle,

Thanks a lot for the reply.  I tried it and replaced the port 502 with 17002. Also i changed the slave id byte8 as shown in the below picture. But still the reply from the modbus slave is not right. The same port number  and slave id works fine in Modscan. Do you see any other problem here?

Senthil1_0-1718722915597.png

 

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Senthil1
Crewman Senthil1
Crewman

Posted: ‎2024-06-18 08:15 AM

In response to Bosswaffle
1 Like
1
1123
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-18 08:15 AM

Hi Bosswaffle,

Thanks a lot for the reply. I tried the same and edited the slave id and port number in the respective bytes as shown below but the modbus reply is not correct. With the same port number & slave id, Modscan works fine. what could be the issue?

Senthil1_0-1718723601791.png

 

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander Bosswaffle
Lt. Commander

Posted: ‎2024-06-19 05:29 AM

In response to Senthil1
0 Likes
0
1119
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-19 05:29 AM

Looks like youre tying to ask for untid 10 @ 192.168.0.9?

The only differencd I see in our arrays is my ProtId is 16x02 in stead of 16x00 in your Read_Addr[2] high byte. I'm just running a simulation on my compter. do you have a "normal" modbus device you can test the addmx and read_var function with (using the normal port)?

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Senthil1
Crewman Senthil1
Crewman

Posted: ‎2024-06-26 04:59 AM

1 Like
0
1069
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2024-06-26 04:59 AM

Thanks a lot for the reply, after changing it to 2, it started working fine.

Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Preview Exit Preview

never-displayed

You must be signed in to add attachments

never-displayed

 
To The Top!

Forums

  • APC UPS Data Center Backup Solutions
  • EcoStruxure IT
  • EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
  • Metering & Power Quality
  • Schneider Electric Wiser

Knowledge Center

Events & webinars

Ideas

Blogs

Get Started

  • Ask the Community
  • Community Guidelines
  • Community User Guide
  • How-To & Best Practice
  • Experts Leaderboard
  • Contact Support
Brand-Logo
Subscribing is a smart move!
You can subscribe to this board after you log in or create your free account.
Forum-Icon

Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.

Register today for FREE

Register Now

Already have an account? Login

Terms & Conditions Privacy Notice Change your Cookie Settings © 2025 Schneider Electric

This is a heading

With achievable small steps, users progress and continually feel satisfaction in task accomplishment.

Usetiful Onboarding Checklist remembers the progress of every user, allowing them to take bite-sized journeys and continue where they left.

of