Ask Me About Webinar: Data Center Assets - Modeling, Cooling, and CFD Simulation Join our 30-minute expert session on July 10, 2025 (9:00 AM & 5:00 PM CET), to explore Digital Twins, cooling simulations, and IT infrastructure modeling. Learn how to boost resiliency and plan power capacity effectively.Register now to secure your spot!
ATV6xx / ATV9xx Published THDi versus Measured THDi
Industry Automation and Control Forum
This forum is addressing industrial automation design & engineering, operations, asset performance, cyber security and digital transformation for Plants & Machines.
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send InviteCancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
Posted: 2025-07-3110:30 AM
ATV6xx / ATV9xx Published THDi versus Measured THDi
Hi, coming across a discrepancy I have not been able to understand/resolve.
In our application we have 5 VFDs with each one directly connected to a WEG motor. Total full load power for our application is 94kW.
Specifically we are using 5 x ATV930 22kW (30HP), operating as a Normal Duty application. We have technical data for the THDi from SE that the 44% < THDi < 55% (see attached for 80%-100% load). Meanwhile during actual testing we see values of ~33%, for all 5 VFDs (see attached).
94kW/110kW = 85.5%
So I would have expected close to 50% THDi, but instead it shows ~33%.
Can someone explain why we are seeing a lower THDi than the technical data from SE?
This is a good result, but I need to be able to explain it.
Can you also explain at the much lower loads we see THDi of ~126%?
I know at partial load THDi is much worse but I have not seen such high values of 126% before. I did not know those are possible.
At low load, I_Main_rms is small, which can result in values such as 126%. This is expected behavior.
Additionally, grid impedance (Zgrid) can be approximated by:
Zgrid (supply impedance) = VLL / 1.7 x Isc
Isc is the short-circuit current. A low grid impedance (strong supply) can reduce THDi, which may explain your ~33% result.
We believe these measurements should be interpreted in the context of the actual supply conditions. Catalog values are based on standardized test conditions, so deviations in actual field measurements are normal. Hope this helps.
This is a heading
With achievable small steps, users progress and continually feel satisfaction in task accomplishment.
Usetiful Onboarding Checklist remembers the progress of every user, allowing them to take bite-sized journeys and continue where they left.