This blog is addressing the Industry 4.0 and includes news and information aroud topics as smart manufacturing, artificial intelligence and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send InviteCancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.
2020-03-0902:44 AM
Predictive Maintenance and Condition Monitoring
Originally published on Industry 4.0 Blog by Anonymous user | March 09, 2020 10:44 AM
Originally published on GMI blog by GM International| July 06, 2018
Condition MonitoringandPredictive Maintenanceare two concepts that often come up in the context ofsafety engineering.Both are related to ensuring permanent availability of safety-critical equipment, with minimal or even zero interruption. In practice, this translates into a need to ensure prompt and efficient maintenance which resolves – or, ideally,prevents– any defect in a timely manner.
Maintenanceis a component of any system’s lifetime and it is critical to ensuring its adequate and safe functioning. However, maintenance costs time and money, and performing, it may requires restricting or interrupting a system’s functioning. Well-founded maintenance is an engineering practice, whereas unnecessary maintenance is not only a waste of resources, but it is also detrimental to the functioning of a system as a whole.
This translates to two basic questions:whatprocedures are necessary, andwhen?
CONDITION MONITORING AND PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE
Condition Monitoringis one of the most useful methods to provide an answer to these questions. It refers to thecontinuous monitoring of the equipment’s stateand operating parameters, usually through dedicated sensors and monitoring tools.
Its end goal is toidentify changes that indicate damage, incorrect configuration or other safety-impacting conditions, so that corrective maintenance repairs can be performed before a failure gets the chance to occur.
Exactly which parameters are monitored depends, of course, on application and equipment: they include, for example, temperature and vibration parameters for electrical drives, or SNR levels for communication equipment. Not only can these parameters indicate an impending failure, but they can also indicate which components are most likely to be at fault, thus enabling engineers to plan and target their maintenance operations with more accuracy.
Data obtained throughCondition Monitoringprovides valuable information about the current state of a system. But its value is not limited to evaluating an equipment’s condition at a given time. Its evolution can be used toanticipatehow an equipment will perform and how it might degrade – and toschedule maintenanceaccording to these expectations.
This is known asPredictive Maintenanceand it is based onanticipatingthe future evolution of a system – in other words, onanticipating what failures may occurand what maintenance needs to be performed in order to prevent them from occurring.
Unlike Preventive Maintenance, where maintenance operations are scheduled based on equipment-specific knowledge, statistics and legal or internal requirements, the Predictive onerelies on dataabout a system’s state and evolution to schedule maintenance operations as they are needed.
Predictive Maintenance enablesmore efficient, longer-term planning for maintenance operationsand makes iteasier to define operational maintenance goalsand to allocate maintenance resources.
Examining data from hundreds or thousands of sensors, gathered over months or even years, is well beyond the capabilities of human operators. Furthermore, the mathematical models, which describe an equipment’s evolution (and predict potential faults) based on such a wealth of data, are generally prohibitively complex to be used by humans.
Consequently, in recent years, Predictive Maintenance has come to rely increasingly onMachine Learningtechniques. Machine Learning refers toa set of statistical techniques,which enable computer systems to learn how to identify and classify patterns in large volumes of data and to make predictions based on it.
CONCLUSION
Condition Monitoring refers to theprocess of monitoring a system’s statein order to identify changes, which would indicate damage or an impeding failure. It enables operators to identify and correct problems (through repair and maintenance procedures) before they cause equipment to fail.
Predictive Maintenance refers toplanning corrective maintenancebased on predictionsabout the evolution of a system. These predictions are based on data obtained through Condition Monitoring, and on system-specific knowledge.
In other words, Predictive Maintenance is one of the ways in which Condition Monitoring can be leveraged. The two arecomplementaryand refer to different ways of using and acting upon sensor data.
Both arereliable methods to ensure operational safetyat every level, including inhazardous areas. However, it is worth iterating that both of them depend on the quality and integrity of sensor data:the quality and safetyof the sensors, measurements and transmission chains is critical to their success.