Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Notifications
Login / Register
Community
Community
Notifications
close
  • Forums
  • Knowledge Center
  • Events & Webinars
  • Ideas
  • Blogs
Help
Help
  • Explore Community
  • Get Started
  • Ask the Community
  • How-To & Best Practices
  • Contact Support
Login / Register
Sustainability
Sustainability

Join our "Ask Me About" community webinar on May 20th at 9 AM CET and 5 PM CET to explore cybersecurity and monitoring for Data Center and edge IT. Learn about market trends, cutting-edge technologies, and best practices from industry experts.
Register and secure your Critical IT infrastructure

IEC 60364-5-52 cable carrying capacity

Power Distribution and Digital Support

Join experts & peers to learn, share and engage about the key trends of electrical distribution around safety, availability, efficiency and connectivity, as well as power standards & regulations. From design to implementation and operation, let’s discuss how digital and software are transforming your business and your day-to-day work.

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Home
  • Schneider Electric Community
  • Power Distribution IEC
  • Power Distribution and Digital Support
  • IEC 60364-5-52 cable carrying capacity
Options
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Mark Topic as New
  • Mark Topic as Read
  • Float this Topic for Current User
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Printer Friendly Page
Invite a Co-worker
Send a co-worker an invite to the portal.Just enter their email address and we'll connect them to register. After joining, they will belong to the same company.
You have entered an invalid email address. Please re-enter the email address.
This co-worker has already been invited to the Exchange portal. Please invite another co-worker.
Please enter email address
Send Invite Cancel
Invitation Sent
Your invitation was sent.Thanks for sharing Exchange with your co-worker.
Send New Invite Close
Top Experts
User Count
Genghiz
Captain Genghiz Captain
93
Gregoire_Brun
Commander Gregoire_Brun Commander
71
J_Travostino
Sisko J_Travostino Sisko
70
S-W
Commander S-W Commander
65
View All
Related Products
product field
Schneider Electric
EcoStruxure™ Power Design – Ecodial

Invite a Colleague

Found this content useful? Share it with a Colleague!

Invite a Colleague Invite
Solved Go to Solution
Back to Power Distribution and Digital Support
Solved
KrunoslavSever
Ensign KrunoslavSever Ensign
Ensign

Posted: ‎2022-12-16 06:19 AM . Last Modified: ‎2024-11-22 04:25 AM

0 Likes
4
4321
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-16 06:19 AM . Last Modified: ‎2024-11-22 04:25 AM

IEC 60364-5-52 cable carrying capacity

EcoStruxure power design - Ecodial 4.9.8 & Ecostruxure power design E1.94

Hi,

I've noticed that current carrying capacities or Iz are not aligned with table B.52.10 in my calculations. My case is with installation method 31 / E or multicore cables on horizontal perforated tray for PVC type cables made of copper. Temperature for ambiental air is set to 30°, and I'm looking at one cable per tray. Ecodial gives me for 10 mm2=54.5A, for 16 mm2=72,7A, for 25 mm2=91,8A, and so on. From IEC 60364-5-52 table B.52.10 currents should be 60, 80 and 101 amps for those mentioned cables. Is there some factor that I'm missing?

In the other software Ecostruxure power design, I'm getting capacities according to mentioned table.

Thank you.

 

Best regards

Kruno

Labels
  • Labels:
  • Power Distribution Software
  • Tags:
  • english
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

  • All forum topics
  • Previous Topic
  • Next Topic

Accepted Solutions
Genghiz
Captain Genghiz Captain
Captain

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 11:58 PM

In response to KrunoslavSever
0 Likes
1
4271
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 11:58 PM

Hello

Thanks for the given project file.

At the given example, the circuit protection is considered as “FUSE.”

In this case, there is an additional coefficient is considered based on the type of protective device.

Coefficient with respect to protection deviceCoefficient with respect to protection device

As compared to my example; here the value (60 Amps) is multiplied by 1.10 and resuled to 54.5 =~ 55 

We confirm; that the application is working as expected.

 

Regards,

Team - Ecodial Expert Support

See Answer In Context

  • Tags:
  • english
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Replies 4
Genghiz
Captain Genghiz Captain
Captain

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 03:24 AM . Last Modified: ‎2022-12-19 03:30 AM

0 Likes
0
4291
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 03:24 AM . Last Modified: ‎2022-12-19 03:30 AM

 

Hello

Thanks for your interest in Ecodial.

In the following image: we can see the results from the Ecodial for the ‘load of 50 Amps’ with inputs defined by the user.

 

Installation method 31 / E

Multicore cables

On horizontal perforated tray f

Insulation: PVC type cables

Material: copper.

Air ambient temperature: 30°

Arrangement: one cable per tray.

 

Ecodial Result.png

 

In our analysis; the results are coming as expected.

If you need further analysis, then kindly please share with us the project file.

 

Regards, 

Team-Ecodial Expert Support.

  • Tags:
  • english
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

KrunoslavSever
Ensign KrunoslavSever Ensign
Ensign

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 04:09 AM

0 Likes
2
4287
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 04:09 AM

Many thank's for your reply Genghiz,

you can find the file in attachment. I'm still getting smaller currents. For example, cable cross section of 10 mm2 returns 54.5 amps.

Attachments
compare.zip
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Genghiz
Captain Genghiz Captain
Captain

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 11:58 PM

In response to KrunoslavSever
0 Likes
1
4272
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-19 11:58 PM

Hello

Thanks for the given project file.

At the given example, the circuit protection is considered as “FUSE.”

In this case, there is an additional coefficient is considered based on the type of protective device.

Coefficient with respect to protection deviceCoefficient with respect to protection device

As compared to my example; here the value (60 Amps) is multiplied by 1.10 and resuled to 54.5 =~ 55 

We confirm; that the application is working as expected.

 

Regards,

Team - Ecodial Expert Support

  • Tags:
  • english
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

KrunoslavSever
Ensign KrunoslavSever Ensign
Ensign

Posted: ‎2022-12-20 12:39 AM

In response to Genghiz
0 Likes
0
4266
  • Mark as New
  • Bookmark
  • Subscribe
  • Mute
  • Subscribe to RSS Feed
  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Email to a Friend
  • Report Inappropriate Content

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Posted: ‎2022-12-20 12:39 AM

Thank you for reply. 

In the other software Ecostruxure power design, values are the same in case of a fuse or a circuit breaker (that is contrary).

Thank you again for ecodial analysis.

Best regards

Kruno

Attachments
comparison.zip
Reply

Link copied. Please paste this link to share this article on your social media post.

Preview Exit Preview

never-displayed

You must be signed in to add attachments

never-displayed

 
To The Top!

Forums

  • APC UPS Data Center Backup Solutions
  • EcoStruxure IT
  • EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
  • Metering & Power Quality
  • Schneider Electric Wiser

Knowledge Center

Events & webinars

Ideas

Blogs

Get Started

  • Ask the Community
  • Community Guidelines
  • Community User Guide
  • How-To & Best Practice
  • Experts Leaderboard
  • Contact Support
Brand-Logo
Subscribing is a smart move!
You can subscribe to this board after you log in or create your free account.
Forum-Icon

Create your free account or log in to subscribe to the board - and gain access to more than 10,000+ support articles along with insights from experts and peers.

Register today for FREE

Register Now

Already have an account? Login

Terms & Conditions Privacy Notice Change your Cookie Settings © 2025 Schneider Electric

This is a heading

With achievable small steps, users progress and continually feel satisfaction in task accomplishment.

Usetiful Onboarding Checklist remembers the progress of every user, allowing them to take bite-sized journeys and continue where they left.

of